S. 295 - Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act
- Sponsor:
- Steve Daines
- Summary:
- A bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit judges, to divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into 2 circuits, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has been referred to committee.
Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act
S. 295 — 115th Congress (2017–2018)
- Summary
- A bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit judges, to divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into 2 circuits, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- A bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit judges, to divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into 2 circuits, and for other purposes.
- Other Titles
- Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act
- Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act
- Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act
- Sponsor
- Steve Daines
- Co-Sponsors
- Subjects
- Law
- Alaska
- Arizona
- California
- Federal appellate courts
- Guam
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Judges
- Judicial procedure and administration
- Montana
- Nevada
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Oregon
- Washington State
- Related Bills
- H.R. 196 (115th) : Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017
- H.R. 250 (115th) : Judicial Administration and Improvement Act of 2016
- S. 276 (115th) : Judicial Administration and Improvement Act of 2017
- H.R. 1598 (115th) : Ninth Circuit Court Modernization and Twelfth Circuit Court Creation Act of 2017
- S. 3259 (115th) : Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act
- Major Actions
Introduced 2/02/2017 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 2/02/2017 2/02/2017 Introduced in Senate 2/02/2017 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
Contributions
- November - December 2010 For $0 Against $402,561
- January - February 2011 For $0 Against $1,709,788
- March - April 2011 For $0 Against $3,894,416
- May - June 2011 For $0 Against $4,109,655
- July - August 2011 For $0 Against $1,810,869
- September - October 2011 For $0 Against $4,418,702
- November - December 2011 For $0 Against $4,299,765
- January - February 2012 For $0 Against $2,573,205
- March - April 2012 For $0 Against $4,491,087
- May - June 2012 For $0 Against $5,621,638
- July - August 2012 For $0 Against $4,415,519
- September - October 2012 For $0 Against $9,204,171
- November - December 2012 For $0 Against $1,067,476
- January - February 2013 For $0 Against $1,157,358
- March - April 2013 For $0 Against $3,185,170
- May - June 2013 For $0 Against $3,034,404
- July - August 2013 For $0 Against $1,810,100
- September - October 2013 For $0 Against $2,479,946
- November - December 2013 For $0 Against $2,432,415
- January - February 2014 For $0 Against $1,342,517
- March - April 2014 For $0 Against $3,111,552
- May - June 2014 For $0 Against $3,730,156
- July - August 2014 For $0 Against $2,016,860
- September - October 2014 For $0 Against $4,302,628
- November - December 2014 For $0 Against $706,383
- January - February 2015 For $0 Against $1,315,105
- March - April 2015 For $0 Against $4,247,662
- May - June 2015 For $0 Against $4,299,095
- July - August 2015 For $0 Against $1,721,536
- September - October 2015 For $0 Against $3,368,949
- November - December 2015 For $0 Against $3,230,319
- January - February 2016 For $0 Against $2,228,516
- March - April 2016 For $0 Against $4,634,908
- May - June 2016 For $0 Against $5,269,226
- July - August 2016 For $0 Against $3,828,937
- September - October 2016 For $0 Against $5,999,011
- November - December 2016 For $0 Against $590,757
Votes
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org