H.Con.Res. 89 - Expressing the Sense of Congress That a Carbon Tax Would Be Detrimental to the United States Economy.
- Sponsor:
- Steve Scalise
- Summary:
- Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill was voted on in the House on June 10, 2016
PASSED on June 10, 2016.
1/2 required to pass
voted YES: 237
voted NO: 163
35 voted present/not voting
Expressing the Sense of Congress That a Carbon Tax Would Be Detrimental to the United States Economy.
H.Con.Res. 89 — 114th Congress (2015–2016)
- Summary
- Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.
- Other Titles
- Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.
- Sponsor
- Steve Scalise
- Co-Sponsors
- Ralph Lee Abraham
- Brian Babin
- Andy Barr
- Joe Barton
- Gus M. Bilirakis
- Mike Bishop
- Diane Black
- Marsha Blackburn
- Charles W. Boustany Jr.
- Kevin Brady
- Jim Bridenstine
- Susan W. Brooks
- Larry Bucshon
- Tom Cole
- Chris Collins
- Kevin Cramer
- John Abney Culberson
- Ron DeSantis
- Scott DesJarlais
- Jeff Duncan
- John J. Duncan, Jr.
- Renee L. Ellmers
- Blake Farenthold
- Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann
- John Fleming
- Bill Flores
- Trent Franks
- Bob Gibbs
- Paul A. Gosar
- Sam Graves
- H. Morgan Griffith
- Brett Guthrie
- Jeb Hensarling
- Jody B. Hice
- George Holding
- Richard Hudson
- Bill Huizenga
- Randy Hultgren
- Darrell E. Issa
- Evan H. Jenkins
- Sam Johnson
- Mike Kelly
- Robert E. Latta
- Billy Long
- Frank D. Lucas
- Blaine Luetkemeyer
- Kenny Marchant
- Thomas Massie
- Michael T. McCaul
- Tom McClintock
- David B. McKinley
- John R. Moolenaar
- Alexander X. Mooney
- Markwayne Mullin
- Mick Mulvaney
- Tim Murphy
- Kristi L. Noem
- Pete Olson
- Steven M. Palazzo
- Stevan Pearce
- Mike Pompeo
- Bill Posey
- Tom Price
- John Ratcliffe
- James B. Renacci
- David P. Roe
- Todd Rokita
- Peter J. Roskam
- David Rouzer
- F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.
- Pete Sessions
- Christopher H. Smith
- Lamar Smith
- Steve Stivers
- Ann Wagner
- Tim Walberg
- Jackie Walorski
- Randy K. Weber, Sr.
- Roger Williams
- Joe Wilson
- Kevin Yoder
- Todd Young
- Subjects
- Taxation
- Climate change and greenhouse gases
- Energy prices
- Oil and gas
- Sales and excise taxes
- User charges and fees
- Related Bills
- S.Res. 472 (114th) : A Resolution Expressing the Sense of the Senate That a Carbon Tax Would Be Detrimental to the Economy of the United States.
- H.Res. 767 (114th) : Providing for Consideration of the Bill (H.R. 4775) to Facilitate Efficient State Implementation of Ground-Level Ozone Standards, and for Other Purposes; Providing for Consideration of the Concurrent Resolution (H. Con. Res. 89) Expressing the Sense of Congress That a Carbon Tax Would Be Detrimental to the United States Economy; and Providing for the Consideration of the Concurrent Resolution (H. Con. Res. 112) Expressing the Sense of Congress Opposing the President's Proposed $10 Tax on Every Barrel of Oil.
- Major Actions
Introduced 10/29/2015 Referred to Committee Passed House 6/10/2016 - Bill History
-
Chamber/Committee Motion Date Result currently selected House On Agreeing to the Resolution: H CON RES 89 Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy 6/10/2016 This bill PASSED the House 237 voted YES 163 voted NO 35 voted present/not votingAction Date Description Introduced 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. 10/29/2015 Introduced in House 6/07/2016 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 767 Reported to House. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4775, H. Con. Res. 89, and H. Con. Res. 112. 6/10/2016 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 767. 6/10/2016 Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4775, H. Con. Res. 89, and H. Con. Res. 112. 6/10/2016 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 89. 6/10/2016 The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. 6/10/2016 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At conclusion of debate on H.Con.Res. 89, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Black demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing to the resolution until later in the legislative day. 6/10/2016 Considered as unfinished business. 6/10/2016 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. currently selected House Vote on Passage 6/10/2016 On Agreeing to the Resolution: H CON RES 89 Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy 6/13/2016 Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
Average contributions given to House members from interest groups that…
supported this bill
Petroleum refining & marketing |
Mining |
Chambers of commerce |
Energy, Natural Resources and Environment |
Fiscal & tax policy (split) |
Republican/Conservative (split) |
opposed this bill
Environmental policy |
Christian Conservative |
Consumer groups |
Fiscal & tax policy (split) |
Republican/Conservative (split) |
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org