S. 1589 - Improving Quality of Care Within the Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 2013
- Sponsor:
- Richard Burr
- Summary:
- Status:
- The bill has been referred to committee.
Improving Quality of Care Within the Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 2013
S. 1589 — 113th Congress (2013–2014)
- Summary
- A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure the Department of Veterans Affairs has an up-to-date policy on reporting of cases of infectious diseases, to require an independent assessment of the Veterans Integrated Service Networks and medical centers of the Department, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure the Department of Veterans Affairs has an up-to-date policy on reporting of cases of infectious diseases, to require an independent assessment of the Veterans Integrated Service Networks and medical centers of the Department, and for other purposes.
- Other Titles
- Improving Quality of Care Within the Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 2013
- Improving Quality of Care Within the Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 2013
- Sponsor
- Richard Burr
- Co-Sponsors
- Subjects
- Armed forces and national security
- Congressional oversight
- Department of Veterans Affairs
- Health care quality
- Health facilities and institutions
- Health information and medical records
- Health personnel
- Health programs administration and funding
- Infectious and parasitic diseases
- Performance measurement
- Veterans' medical care
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 10/28/2013 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 10/28/2013 10/28/2013 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs. 10/28/2013 Introduced in Senate 10/30/2013 Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 113-280. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org