H.R. 6480 - Internet Radio Fairness Act of 2012
- Sponsor:
- Jason Chaffetz
- Summary:
- To adopt fair standards and procedures by which determinations of Copyright Royalty Judges are made with respect to webcasting, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has been introduced.
Internet Radio Fairness Act of 2012
H.R. 6480 — 112th Congress (2011–2012)
- Summary
- To adopt fair standards and procedures by which determinations of Copyright Royalty Judges are made with respect to webcasting, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- To adopt fair standards and procedures by which determinations of Copyright Royalty Judges are made with respect to webcasting, and for other purposes.
- Other Titles
- Internet Radio Fairness Act of 2012
- Sponsor
- Jason Chaffetz
- Co-Sponsors
- Subjects
- Commerce
- Administrative remedies
- Broadcasting, cable, digital technologies
- Competition and antitrust
- Congressional agencies
- Congressional oversight
- Government information and archives
- Intellectual property
- Internet and video services
- Judicial review and appeals
- Library of Congress
- Licensing and registrations
- Music
- Sound recording
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 9/21/2012 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 9/21/2012 9/21/2012 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 10/02/2012 Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
Total contributions given to House members from interest groups that…
supported this bill
Commercial TV & radio stations | $1,924,681 |
Computer manufacture & services | $996,062 |
Online Entertainment | $110,000 |
Communications & Electronics | $51,250 |
Consumer groups | $728 |
$3,082,721 |
opposed this bill
Minority/Ethnic Groups | $975,942 |
Recorded Music & music production | $613,392 |
Labor Unions | $351,675 |
Entertainment unions | $263,479 |
Fiscal & tax policy | $8,500 |
$2,212,988 |
Interest groups that supported this bill gave 39% more as interest groups that opposed this bill
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org