H.R. 3582 - Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012
- Sponsor:
- Tom Price
- Summary:
- To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislation. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill was voted on in the House on February 2, 2012
- Amendments:
- 8 proposed amendments. 1 accepted. 5 rejected. View amendments
PASSED on February 2, 2012.
1/2 required to pass
voted YES: 242
voted NO: 179
12 voted present/not voting
Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012
H.R. 3582 — 112th Congress (2011–2012)
- Summary
- To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislation. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislation.
- Other Titles
- Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011
- Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012
- Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012
- Sponsor
- Tom Price
- Co-Sponsors
- Justin Amash
- Steve Austria
- Lou Barletta
- Roscoe G. Bartlett
- Joe Barton
- Gus M. Bilirakis
- Diane Black
- Marsha Blackburn
- Jo Bonner
- Paul C. Broun
- Jason Chaffetz
- Chip Cravaack
- John Abney Culberson
- Scott DesJarlais
- Jeff Flake
- John Fleming
- Bill Flores
- Trent Franks
- Cory Gardner
- Scott Garrett
- Christopher P. Gibson
- Phil Gingrey
- Paul A. Gosar
- Tom Graves
- Richard L. Hanna
- Gregg Harper
- Andy Harris
- Nan A. S. Hayworth
- Jeb Hensarling
- Tim Huelskamp
- Randy Hultgren
- Bill Johnson
- Jack Kingston
- Adam Kinzinger
- John Kline
- James Lankford
- Cynthia M. Lummis
- Connie Mack
- Donald A. Manzullo
- Kenny Marchant
- Tom McClintock
- Patrick T. McHenry
- David B. McKinley
- Mick Mulvaney
- Erik Paulsen
- Stevan Pearce
- Joseph R. Pitts
- Bill Posey
- Benjamin Quayle
- Tom Reed
- Reid J. Ribble
- David Rivera
- David P. Roe
- Todd Rokita
- Dennis A. Ross
- Paul D. Ryan
- Steve Scalise
- Austin Scott
- Steve Stivers
- Marlin A. Stutzman
- John Sullivan
- Patrick J. Tiberi
- Tim Walberg
- Lynn A. Westmoreland
- Joe Wilson
- Rob Woodall
- Subjects
- Economics and public finance
- Budget process
- Congressional oversight
- Economic performance and conditions
- Economic theory
- Government studies and investigations
- Legislative rules and procedure
- Related Bills
- H.Res. 534 (112th) : Providing for Consideration of the Bill (H.R. 3578) to Amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to Reform the Budget Baseline, and Providing for Consideration of the Bill (H.R. 3582) to Amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to Provide for Macro-Economic Analysis of the Impact of Legislation.
- S. 1996 (112th) : Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011
- Major Actions
Introduced 12/07/2011 Referred to Committee Amendments (8 proposed) Passed House 2/02/2012 - Bill History
-
Chamber/Committee Motion Date Result select this vote House On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 1 to H R 3582 2/02/2012 This amendment DID NOT PASS the House 174 voted YES 244 voted NO 15 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 2 to H R 3582 2/02/2012 This amendment DID NOT PASS the House 177 voted YES 237 voted NO 19 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 4 to H R 3582 2/02/2012 This amendment DID NOT PASS the House 171 voted YES 243 voted NO 19 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 5 to H R 3582 2/02/2012 This amendment DID NOT PASS the House 173 voted YES 243 voted NO 17 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 8 to H R 3582 2/02/2012 This amendment DID NOT PASS the House 174 voted YES 245 voted NO 14 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H R 3582 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislation 2/02/2012 This motion DID NOT PASS the House 183 voted YES 237 voted NO 13 voted present/not votingcurrently selected House H.R. 3582 (112th): Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012 2/02/2012 This bill PASSED the House 242 voted YES 179 voted NO 12 voted present/not votingselect this vote House On agreeing to the Walz (MN) amendment (A003) Agreed to by voice vote. 2/02/2012 PASSED by voice vote Action Date Description Introduced 12/07/2011 12/07/2011 Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. 12/07/2011 Referred to House Budget 12/07/2011 Referred to House Rules 1/24/2012 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held. 1/25/2012 Mr. McHenry asked unanimous consent that the Committee on The Budget have until 3:00 p.m. on Jan. 30 to file a report on H.R. 3582. Agreed to without objection. 1/30/2012 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Budget. H. Rept. 112-377, Part I. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order. 1/30/2012 Committee on Rules discharged. Put on a legislative calendar 1/30/2012 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 258. 2/01/2012 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 534 Reported to House. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The resolution provides for one hour of debate, each, on H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582. All points of order against consideration of both H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582 are waived. For H.R. 3578, the resolution makes in order the amendment printed in Part A of the report accompanying this resolution and for H.R.3582, the resolution makes in order the amendments printed in part B of the report accompanying this resolution. 2/02/2012 Rule H. Res. 534 passed House. 2/02/2012 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 534. 2/02/2012 Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The resolution provides for one hour of debate, each, on H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582. All points of order against consideration of both H.R. 3578 and H.R. 3582 are waived. For H.R. 3578, the resolution makes in order the amendment printed in Part A of the report accompanying this resolution and for H.R.3582, the resolution makes in order the amendments printed in part B of the report accompanying this resolution. 2/02/2012 House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 534 and Rule XVIII. 2/02/2012 The Speaker designated the Honorable Robert J. Dold to act as Chairman of the Committee. 2/02/2012 GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3582. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters Part B amendment No. 1. 2/02/2012 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) Part B amendment No. 2. 2/02/2012 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Walz Part B amendment No. 3. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fudge Part B amendment No. 4. 2/02/2012 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fudge amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Fudge demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee Part B amendment No. 5. 2/02/2012 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Quigley Part B amendment No. 6. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake Part B amendment No. 7. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cicilline Part B amendment No. 8. 2/02/2012 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cicilline substitute amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cicilline demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. 2/02/2012 UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed. 2/02/2012 The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3582. 2/02/2012 The previous question was ordered without objection. 2/02/2012 The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. 2/02/2012 Mr. Boswell moved to recommit with instructions to the Budget Committee. 2/02/2012 DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Boswell motion to recommit. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add a new subsection entitled "Impacts on Medicare Benefits, Beneficiaries, the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds". 2/02/2012 The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. 2/02/2012 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 1 to H R 3582 select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 2 to H R 3582 select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 4 to H R 3582 select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 5 to H R 3582 select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amendment 8 to H R 3582 select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H R 3582 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide for macroeconomic analysis of the impact of legislation currently selected House Vote on Passage 2/02/2012 H.R. 3582 (112th): Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2012 2/02/2012 Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Peters. 2/02/2012 Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Connolly (VA). 2/02/2012 Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Walz (MN). select this vote Vote 2/02/2012 On agreeing to the Walz (MN) amendment (A003) Agreed to by voice vote. 2/02/2012 Amendment (A004) offered by Ms. Fudge. 2/02/2012 Amendment (A005) offered by Ms. Jackson Lee (TX). 2/02/2012 Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Quigley. 2/02/2012 By unanimous consent, the Quigley amendment was withdrawn. 2/02/2012 Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Flake. 2/02/2012 Amendment (A008) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Cicilline. 2/02/2012 By unanimous consent, the Flake amendment was withdrawn. 2/06/2012 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status select this vote H. Amdt. 914 Peters, Gary [D-MI] February 2, 2012 Failed by roll call vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment sought to add a factual findings section addressing the macroeconomic impact of the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003.
select this vote H. Amdt. 915 Connolly, Gerald [D-VA11] February 2, 2012 Failed by roll call vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment sought to extend the requirement for the Congressional Budget Office to prepare macroeconomic analysis of major legislation to bills or resolutions reported by the Appropriations Committees of each Chamber.
select this vote H. Amdt. 916 Walz, Timothy [D-MN1] February 2, 2012 Passed by voice vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment ensures that CBO and JCT expressly include interest rates among the major economic variables to be estimated in the macroeconomic impact analysis.
select this vote H. Amdt. 917 Fudge, Marcia [D-OH11] February 2, 2012 Failed by roll call vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment sought to add income equality to the list of variables used to determine the economic impact of the bill.
select this vote H. Amdt. 918 Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX18] February 2, 2012 Failed by roll call vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment sought to require CBO to include as part of their macroeconomic analysis estimates of the potential impact, if any, on HUB ZONE areas as defined by the Small Business Act.
H. Amdt. 919 Quigley, Mike [D-IL5] February 2, 2012 Offered on February 1, 2012. An amendment numbered 6 printed in Part B of House Report 112-383 to require the CBO to establish a website where taxpayers could enter their annual income and receive an estimate of the amount of their projected contribution to or receipt from any applicable major bill or resolution over the next 10 years, assuming the taxpayer has constant annual income.
H. Amdt. 920 Flake, Jeff [R-AZ] February 2, 2012 Offered on February 1, 2012. An amendment numbered 7 printed in Part B of House Report 112-383 lower the threshold for requiring a dynamic score from .25% of the current GDP to $5 billion.
select this vote H. Amdt. 921 Cicilline, David [D-RI1] February 2, 2012 Failed by roll call vote on February 2, 2012. Amendment sought to amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that, in addition to preparing cost estimates for each bill or resolution reported by any committee of the House, the Congressional Budget Office must also prepare an estimate of the number of jobs which would be created, sustained, or lost in carrying out the measure--including regional and State level estimates.
Average contributions given to House members from interest groups that…
supported this bill
Republican/Conservative |
Elderly issues/Social Security |
Fiscal & tax policy |
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org