S. 160 - District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009

Voting, Washington DC, Utah - Congress. 111th Congress (2009-2010) View bill details
Sponsor:
Summary:
A bill to provide the District of Columbia a voting seat and the State of Utah an additional seat in the House of Representatives. (by CRS) 
Status:
The bill was voted on in the Senate on February 26, 2009 
Amendments:
19 proposed amendments. 4 accepted. 2 rejected. View amendments 
Senate Vote: On the Point of Order (Is The Constitutional Point of Order Well Taken?)

on February 25, 2009.

1/2 required to pass

voted YES: 36 voted NO: 62
1 voted present/not voting

District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009

S. 160 — 111th Congress (2009–2010)

Keywords
Voting, Washington DC, Utah
Summary
A bill to provide the District of Columbia a voting seat and the State of Utah an additional seat in the House of Representatives. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
A bill to provide the District of Columbia a voting seat and the State of Utah an additional seat in the House of Representatives.
Other Titles
  • District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009
  • District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009
  • District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009
  • Second Amendment Enforcement Act
Sponsor
Joseph I. Lieberman
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Congress
  • Congressional elections
  • Constitution and constitutional amendments
  • District of Columbia affairs
  • Elections, voting, political campaign regulation
  • House of Representatives
  • Judicial review and appeals
  • Members of Congress
  • Presidents and presidential powers
  • Utah
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced1/06/2009
Referred to Committee
Amendments (19 proposed)
Passed Senate2/26/2009
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenateOn Cloture on the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider S. 160)2/24/2009This motion PASSED the Senate
62 voted YES 34 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 574 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.2/25/2009PASSED by voice vote
currently selectedSenateOn the Point of Order (Is The Constitutional Point of Order Well Taken?)2/25/2009This motion the Senate
36 voted YES 62 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateCoburn Amdt. No. 5812/25/2009This amendment DID NOT PASS the Senate
7 voted YES 91 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateKyl Amdt. No. 5852/26/2009This amendment DID NOT PASS the Senate
30 voted YES 67 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateDurbin Amdt. No. 5912/26/2009This amendment PASSED the Senate
57 voted YES 41 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateDeMint Amdt. No. 5732/26/2009This amendment PASSED the Senate
87 voted YES 11 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateEnsign Amdt. No. 5752/26/2009This amendment PASSED the Senate
62 voted YES 36 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn Passage - Senate - S. 160 As Amended2/26/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
61 voted YES 37 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced1/06/2009
1/06/2009Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
1/06/2009Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S141-142)
Put on a legislative calendar2/11/2009Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
2/12/2009Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Put on a legislative calendar2/12/2009Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 23.
2/13/2009Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.
2/13/2009Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the bill presented in Senate.
2/13/2009Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
2/23/2009Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate.
2/24/2009Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate.
2/24/2009Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
2/24/2009Measure laid before Senate by motion.
select this voteVote2/24/2009On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider S. 160)
2/25/2009Considered by Senate.
2/25/2009Point of order that the measure violates the Constitution raised in Senate.
2/25/2009Cloture motion on the measure presented in Senate.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 574 proposed by Senator Kyl.
select this voteVote2/25/2009Amendment SA 574 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 575 proposed by Senator Ensign.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 576 proposed by Senator Coburn to Amendment SA 575.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 579 proposed by Senator Thune.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 581 proposed by Senator Coburn.
2/25/2009Amendment SA 585 proposed by Senator Kyl.
currently selectedVote2/25/2009On the Point of Order (Is The Constitutional Point of Order Well Taken?)
select this voteVote2/25/2009Coburn Amdt. No. 581
2/26/2009Considered by Senate.
2/26/2009The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
2/26/2009Cloture motion on the measure withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate.
2/26/2009Amendment SA 573 proposed by Senator DeMint.
2/26/2009Considered by Senate.
2/26/2009Considered by Senate.
2/26/2009Proposed amendment SA 576 withdrawn in Senate.
2/26/2009Considered by Senate.
2/26/2009Proposed amendment SA 579 withdrawn in Senate.
2/26/2009Considered by Senate.
2/26/2009Amendment SA 587 proposed by Senator Ensign.
2/26/2009Proposed amendment SA 587 withdrawn in Senate.
2/26/2009Amendment SA 591 proposed by Senator Durbin.
select this voteVote2/26/2009Kyl Amdt. No. 585
select this voteVote2/26/2009Durbin Amdt. No. 591
select this voteVote2/26/2009DeMint Amdt. No. 573
select this voteVote2/26/2009Ensign Amdt. No. 575
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage2/26/2009On Passage - Senate - S. 160 As Amended
2/27/2009Message on Senate action sent to the House.
3/02/2009Received in the House.
3/02/2009Held at the desk.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
select this voteS. Amdt. 573DeMint, Jim [R-SC]February 25, 2009Passed by roll call vote on February 25, 2009.

To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 574Kyl, Jon [R-AZ]February 25, 2009Passed by voice vote on February 24, 2009.

To provide for the expedited judicial review for Members of Congress.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 575Ensign, John [R-NV]February 25, 2009Passed by roll call vote on February 25, 2009.

To restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 576Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]February 25, 2009Withdrawn on February 25, 2009.

To restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 577Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 578Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 579Thune, John [R-SD]February 25, 2009Withdrawn on February 25, 2009.

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to allow citizens who have concealed carry permits from the State or the District of Columbia in which they reside to carry concealed firearms in another State or the District of Columbia that grants concealed carry permits, if the individual complies with the laws of the State or District of Columbia.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 580Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 581Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]February 25, 2009Failed by roll call vote on February 24, 2009.

In the nature of a substitute.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 582Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 583Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 584Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 585Kyl, Jon [R-AZ]February 25, 2009Failed by roll call vote on February 25, 2009.

To provide for the retrocession of the District of Columbia to the State of Maryland, and for other purposes.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 586Durbin, Richard [D-IL]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 587Ensign, John [R-NV]February 25, 2009Withdrawn on February 25, 2009.

To reauthorize the DC School Choice Incentive Act of 2003 for fiscal year 2010.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 588Martinez, Mel [R-FL]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 589Lautenberg, Frank [D-NJ]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 590Lautenberg, Frank [D-NJ]February 25, 2009Offered on February 24, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 591Durbin, Richard [D-IL]February 26, 2009Passed by roll call vote on February 25, 2009.

To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.

Show amendment details

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009: On the Point of Order (Is The Constitutional Point of Order Well Taken?)

0 organizations supported this motion

0 organizations opposed this motion

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Daniel K. AkakaDHI$0$0No
Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$0$0Yes
John BarrassoRWY$0$0Yes
Max BaucusDMT$0$0No
Birch "Evan" BayhDIN$0$0No
Mark BegichDAK$0$0No
Michael F. BennetDCO$0$0No
Bob BennettRUT$0$0Yes
Jesse "Jeff" BingamanDNM$0$0No
Christopher "Kit" BondRMO$0$0Yes
Barbara BoxerDCA$0$0No
Sherrod BrownDOH$0$0No
Sam BrownbackRKS$0$0Yes
Jim BunningRKY$0$0Yes
Richard BurrRNC$0$0Yes
Roland BurrisDIL$0$0No
Robert ByrdDWV$0$0Yes
Maria CantwellDWA$0$0No
Ben CardinDMD$0$0No
Tom CarperDDE$0$0No
Bob CaseyDPA$0$0No
Clarence Saxby ChamblissRGA$0$0Yes
Tom CoburnROK$0$0Yes
William Thad CochranRMS$0$0Yes
Susan M. CollinsRME$0$0No
Gaylord Kent ConradDND$0$0No
Bob CorkerRTN$0$0Yes
John CornynRTX$0$0Yes
Mike CrapoRID$0$0Yes
Jim DeMintRSC$0$0Yes
Chris DoddDCT$0$0No
Byron DorganDND$0$0No
Dick DurbinDIL$0$0No
John EnsignRNV$0$0Yes
Mike EnziRWY$0$0Yes
Russ FeingoldDWI$0$0No
Dianne FeinsteinDCA$0$0No
Kirsten E. GillibrandDNY$0$0No
Lindsey GrahamRSC$0$0Yes
Chuck GrassleyRIA$0$0Yes
Judd GreggRNH$0$0Yes
Kay R. HaganDNC$0$0No
Tom HarkinDIA$0$0No
Orrin G. HatchRUT$0$0No
Kay Bailey HutchisonRTX$0$0Yes
Jim InhofeROK$0$0Yes
Dan InouyeDHI$0$0No
Johnny IsaksonRGA$0$0Yes
Mike JohannsRNE$0$0Yes
Tim JohnsonDSD$0$0No
Ted KaufmanDDE$0$0No
Ted KennedyDMA$0$0Not Voting
John F. KerryDMA$0$0No
Amy KlobucharDMN$0$0No
Herb KohlDWI$0$0No
Jon KylRAZ$0$0Yes
Mary L. LandrieuDLA$0$0No
Frank R. LautenbergDNJ$0$0No
Patrick J. LeahyDVT$0$0No
Carl LevinDMI$0$0No
Joe LiebermanICT$0$0No
Blanche LincolnDAR$0$0No
Dick LugarRIN$0$0No
Mel MartinezRFL$0$0Yes
John McCainRAZ$0$0Yes
Claire McCaskillDMO$0$0No
Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$0$0Yes
Bob MenéndezDNJ$0$0No
Jeff MerkleyDOR$0$0No
Barbara A. MikulskiDMD$0$0No
Lisa MurkowskiRAK$0$0Yes
Patty MurrayDWA$0$0No
Earl "Ben" NelsonDNE$0$0No
Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$0$0No
Mark L. PryorDAR$0$0No
John "Jack" ReedDRI$0$0No
Harry ReidDNV$0$0No
Jim RischRID$0$0Yes
Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$0$0Yes
John "Jay" RockefellerDWV$0$0No
Bernie SandersIVT$0$0No
Chuck SchumerDNY$0$0No
Jeff SessionsRAL$0$0Yes
Jeanne ShaheenDNH$0$0No
Richard C. ShelbyRAL$0$0Yes
Olympia J. SnoweRME$0$0No
Arlen SpecterDPA$0$0No
Debbie StabenowDMI$0$0No
Jon TesterDMT$0$0No
John ThuneRSD$0$0Yes
Mark UdallDCO$0$0No
Tom UdallDNM$0$0No
David VitterRLA$0$0Yes
George VoinovichROH$0$0No
Mark R. WarnerDVA$0$0No
Jim WebbDVA$0$0No
Sheldon WhitehouseDRI$0$0No
Roger F. WickerRMS$0$0Yes
Ron WydenDOR$0$0No

Interest Groups that supported this motion

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this motion

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range