Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2013-2014 Legislature.

AB 2145 - An Act to Amend Sections 331.1 and 366.2 of the Public Utilities Code, Relating to Electricity.

Electricity: community choice aggregation. 2013-2014 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act authorizes a community choice aggregator, as defined, to aggregate the electrical load of interested electricity consumers within its boundaries and requires a community choice aggregator to file an implementation plan with the… More
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act authorizes a community choice aggregator, as defined, to aggregate the electrical load of interested electricity consumers within its boundaries and requires a community choice aggregator to file an implementation plan with the commission and requires that the plan include disclosures of certain information and describe other matter. The act requires a community choice aggregator to register with the commission, which may require additional information to ensure compliance with basic consumer protection rules and other procedural matters. Existing law requires that a city, county, or city and county that elects to implement a community choice aggregation program within its jurisdiction do so by ordinance, but authorizes a city, county, or city and county to request, by affirmative resolution of its governing council or board, that another entity authorized to be a community choice aggregator act as the community choice aggregator on its behalf, in which case, that other entity is responsible for adopting the ordinance to implement the community choice aggregation program on behalf of the requesting city, county, or city and county.

This bill would require solicitations of customers by a community choice aggregator contain, and communication by the community choice aggregator to the public or prospective and existing customers to be consistent with, specified information and would require that the implementation plan filed by a community choice aggregator completely describe certain matter required to be disclosed under existing law. The bill would authorize the commission to require that a community choice aggregator, when registering with the commission, provide additional information to ensure compliance with basic consumer protection and other rules and other procedural matters. If a city, county, or city and county requests another entity that is authorized to be a community choice aggregator to act as the community choice aggregator on its behalf, the bill would require that the entity that is to be the community choice aggregator be in a county that is contiguous to the requesting city, county, or city and county. The bill would provide that, beginning January 1, 2015, no entity may enact an ordinance to serve as the community choice aggregator in more than 3-contiguous-counties, but may serve as the community choice aggregator for any city, county, or city and county that is outside a 3-contiguous-county area, for which it adopted an ordinance prior to January 1, 2015. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive revisions to the community choice aggregator provisions.

The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes the legislative or other governing bodies of 2 or more public agencies to jointly exercise by agreement any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law authorizes any group of cities, counties, or cities and counties whose governing boards have so elected to combine the loads of their programs as a community choice aggregator through the formation of a joint powers agency established pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act.

This bill would prohibit a joint powers agency formed to provide electric service as a community choice aggregator from exceeding the geographical boundaries of 3-contiguous-counties, but would provide that this limitation does not apply where an ordinance authorizing community choice aggregation outside the 3-contiguous-counties was adopted prior to January 1, 2015.

Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.

Because the bill would impose requirements regarding a community choice aggregator, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by a Senate committee on August 14, 2014. 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on May 28, 2014.

voted YES: 51 voted NO: 15
13 voted present/not voting

Other Votes:

An Act to Amend Sections 331.1 and 366.2 of the Public Utilities Code, Relating to Electricity.

AB 2145 — 2013-2014 Legislature

Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act authorizes a community choice aggregator, as defined, to aggregate the electrical load of interested electricity consumers within its boundaries and requires a community choice aggregator to file an implementation plan with the commission and requires that the plan include disclosures of certain information and describe other matter. The act requires a community choice aggregator to register with the commission, which may require additional information to ensure compliance with basic consumer protection rules and other procedural matters. Existing law requires that a city, county, or city and county that elects to implement a community choice aggregation program within its jurisdiction do so by ordinance, but authorizes a city, county, or city and county to request, by affirmative resolution of its governing council or board, that another entity authorized to be a community choice aggregator act as the community choice aggregator on its behalf, in which case, that other entity is responsible for adopting the… More
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act authorizes a community choice aggregator, as defined, to aggregate the electrical load of interested electricity consumers within its boundaries and requires a community choice aggregator to file an implementation plan with the commission and requires that the plan include disclosures of certain information and describe other matter. The act requires a community choice aggregator to register with the commission, which may require additional information to ensure compliance with basic consumer protection rules and other procedural matters. Existing law requires that a city, county, or city and county that elects to implement a community choice aggregation program within its jurisdiction do so by ordinance, but authorizes a city, county, or city and county to request, by affirmative resolution of its governing council or board, that another entity authorized to be a community choice aggregator act as the community choice aggregator on its behalf, in which case, that other entity is responsible for adopting the ordinance to implement the community choice aggregation program on behalf of the requesting city, county, or city and county.

This bill would require solicitations of customers by a community choice aggregator contain, and communication by the community choice aggregator to the public or prospective and existing customers to be consistent with, specified information and would require that the implementation plan filed by a community choice aggregator completely describe certain matter required to be disclosed under existing law. The bill would authorize the commission to require that a community choice aggregator, when registering with the commission, provide additional information to ensure compliance with basic consumer protection and other rules and other procedural matters. If a city, county, or city and county requests another entity that is authorized to be a community choice aggregator to act as the community choice aggregator on its behalf, the bill would require that the entity that is to be the community choice aggregator be in a county that is contiguous to the requesting city, county, or city and county. The bill would provide that, beginning January 1, 2015, no entity may enact an ordinance to serve as the community choice aggregator in more than 3-contiguous-counties, but may serve as the community choice aggregator for any city, county, or city and county that is outside a 3-contiguous-county area, for which it adopted an ordinance prior to January 1, 2015. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive revisions to the community choice aggregator provisions.

The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes the legislative or other governing bodies of 2 or more public agencies to jointly exercise by agreement any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law authorizes any group of cities, counties, or cities and counties whose governing boards have so elected to combine the loads of their programs as a community choice aggregator through the formation of a joint powers agency established pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act.

This bill would prohibit a joint powers agency formed to provide electric service as a community choice aggregator from exceeding the geographical boundaries of 3-contiguous-counties, but would provide that this limitation does not apply where an ordinance authorizing community choice aggregation outside the 3-contiguous-counties was adopted prior to January 1, 2015.

Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.

Because the bill would impose requirements regarding a community choice aggregator, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 331.1 and 366.2 of the Public Utilities Code, Relating to Electricity.
Author(s)
Steven Bradford
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Electricity: community choice aggregation
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/20/2014
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce4/28/2014
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/23/2014
    Passed Assembly5/28/2014
    Passed Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications6/23/2014
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/04/2014
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/14/2014
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Utilities and CommerceDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/28/2014This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce
    9 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/23/2014This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 1 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedAssemblyAB 2145 BRADFORD Assembly Third Reading5/28/2014This bill PASSED the Assembly
    51 voted YES 15 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Energy, Utilities and CommunicationsDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Environmental Quality.6/23/2014This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications
    6 voted YES 3 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.8/04/2014This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/14/2014This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    5 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/20/2014
    2/20/2014Read first time. To print.
    2/21/2014From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
    3/06/2014Referred to Com. on U. & C.
    4/10/2014From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
    4/21/2014Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
    4/28/2014Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.
    select this voteVote4/28/2014Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/30/2014From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    5/21/2014In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    5/23/2014Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (May 23).
    select this voteVote5/23/2014Do pass.
    5/27/2014Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    5/28/2014Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
    5/28/2014In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage5/28/2014AB 2145 BRADFORD Assembly Third Reading
    6/11/2014Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and E.Q.
    6/12/2014From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
    select this voteVote6/23/2014Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Environmental Quality.
    6/30/2014From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 23).
    7/01/2014Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    7/03/2014Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    8/04/2014In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/04/2014Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/14/2014Do pass as amended.
    8/18/2014From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
    8/19/2014Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

    Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

    5 Organizations Supported and 43 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Sections 331.1 and 366.2 of the Public Utilities Code, Relating to Electricity.: AB 2145 BRADFORD Assembly Third Reading

    5 organizations supported this bill

    Coalition of California Utility Employees
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    IBEW Local 1245
    IBEW 1245 (2014, May 1). AB 2145 would protect electric customer choice. Retrieved June 6, 2014, from IBEW 1245.
    PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric)
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
    Lazarus, Jim (2014, April 25). AB 2145 (Bradford) Electricity: community choice aggregation – SUPPORT. Retrieved June 6, 2014, from San Francisco Chamber of Commerce.
    State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    43 organizations opposed this bill

    350 San Francisco
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    alliance for retail energy markets
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    asian pacific environmental network
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Solar Energy Industries Association
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California State Counties Association
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California State Office of Ratepayer Advocates
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Carbon Free Mountain View
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    City of Richmond
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Climate Protection Campaign
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Community Environmental Council
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    County of Marin
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    County of Santa Cruz
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Enlightenment Energy
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Environmental Health Coalition
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Greenlining Institute
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Haight Ashbury Neighborhood Council
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    LEAN Energy US
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Local Clean Energy Alliance
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Marin Clean Energy
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    monterey regional waste management district
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Our City San Francisco
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    OurEvolution Energy & Engineering
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Pacific Energy Advisors
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Public Interest Coalition
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Resilient Neighborhoods
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Diego 350
    San Diego 350 (2014, May 18). Help Support Clean Energy in San Diego! (No on AB 2145). Retrieved June 6, 2014, from San Diego 350.
    San Diego Clean Energy
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Francisco Clean Energy Advocates Alliance
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Francisco Green Party
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    School Project for Utility Rate Reduction
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Shell
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sierra Club California
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Solar Energy Industries Association
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    SolEd Benefit Corporation
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sonoma Clean Power
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    sonoma county board of supervisors
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    sonoma county regional climate protection authority
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sonoma County Water Agency
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sungevity
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sustainable Marin
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    The Utility Reform Network
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    town of fairfax
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    western power trading forum
    Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (2014, April 25). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$2,000$14,650
    Luis AlejoDCA-30$89,499$11,750
    Travis AllenRCA-72$2,000$2,400
    Tom AmmianoDCA-17$59,400$2,000
    Toni G. AtkinsDCA-78$79,000$23,100
    Frank BigelowRCA-5$12,300$150
    Richard BloomDCA-50$7,500$0
    Raul BocanegraDCA-39$4,900$20,600
    Susan BonillaDCA-14$136,205$11,950
    Rob BontaDCA-18$36,200$14,950
    Steven BradfordDCA-62$73,300$39,750
    Cheryl BrownDCA-47$12,800$3,500
    Joan BuchananDCA-16$139,350$23,700
    Ian C. CalderonDCA-57$51,600$17,476
    Nora CamposDCA-27$135,600$9,900
    Ed ChauDCA-49$126,390$23,896
    Rocky J. ChavezRCA-76$3,000$8,800
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$54,221$33,117
    Connie ConwayRCA-26$16,800$56,300
    Ken CooleyDCA-8$150,950$7,000
    Matthew DababnehDCA-45$0$0
    Brian DahleRCA-1$2,000$0
    Tom DalyDCA-69$43,200$16,300
    Roger DickinsonDCA-7$124,600$6,000
    Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$3,000
    Susan Talamantes EggmanDCA-13$57,150$14,300
    Paul FongDCA-28$107,850$7,300
    Steve FoxDCA-36$6,800$0
    Jim FrazierDCA-11$184,060$12,800
    Beth GainesRCA-6$3,500$22,450
    Cristina GarciaDCA-58$82,050$10,300
    Mike GattoDCA-43$139,300$25,326
    Jimmy GomezDCA-51$149,810$10,800
    Lorena S. GonzalezDCA-80$0$0
    Rich GordonDCA-24$97,200$11,400
    Jeff GorellRCA-44$5,000$12,300
    Adam C. GrayDCA-21$129,662$16,600
    Shannon GroveRCA-34$0$19,050
    Curt HagmanRCA-55$8,800$16,500
    Isadore HallDCA-64$71,300$28,900
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$8,800$28,650
    Roger HernandezDCA-48$118,150$23,800
    Chris R. HoldenDCA-41$139,100$20,725
    Brian JonesRCA-71$6,300$16,900
    Reginald B. Jones-Sawyer, Sr.DCA-59$105,250$7,500
    Marc LevineDCA-10$5,723$0
    Eric LinderRCA-60$2,000$1,100
    Dan LogueRCA-3$1,500$17,500
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$35,250$2,500
    Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$8,800$11,800
    Allan MansoorRCA-74$1,000$9,650
    Jose MedinaDCA-61$138,725$5,900
    Melissa A. MelendezRCA-67$2,000$10,050
    Kevin MullinDCA-22$150,100$4,556
    Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$148,100$15,400
    Adrin NazarianDCA-46$62,650$3,500
    Brian NestandeRCA-42$53,300$24,850
    Kristin OlsenRCA-12$6,300$19,300
    Richard PanDCA-9$141,671$20,450
    Jim PattersonRCA-23$0$0
    Henry PereaDCA-31$41,700$47,550
    John PerezDCA-53$252,650$82,300
    Manuel PerezDCA-56$67,150$26,750
    Bill QuirkDCA-20$108,850$500
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$67,899$17,350
    Anthony RendonDCA-63$126,100$17,850
    Sebastian Ridley-ThomasDCA-54$0$0
    Freddie RodriguezDCA-52$0$0
    Rudy SalasDCA-32$100,650$18,200
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$132,700$39,767
    Mark StoneDCA-29$50,450$2,500
    Philip Y. TingDCA-19$155,100$23,141
    Don WagnerRCA-68$7,800$2,500
    Marie WaldronRCA-75$4,900$8,400
    Shirley N. WeberDCA-79$51,900$2,000
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$87,680$15,500
    Scott WilkRCA-38$7,800$12,750
    Das WilliamsDCA-37$164,500$9,000
    Mariko YamadaDCA-4$42,200$4,500

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$2,000$14,650
    Luis AlejoDCA-30$89,499$11,750
    Travis AllenRCA-72$2,000$2,400
    Tom AmmianoDCA-17$59,400$2,000
    Toni G. AtkinsDCA-78$79,000$23,100
    Frank BigelowRCA-5$12,300$150
    Richard BloomDCA-50$7,500$0
    Raul BocanegraDCA-39$4,900$20,600
    Susan BonillaDCA-14$136,205$11,950
    Rob BontaDCA-18$36,200$14,950
    Steven BradfordDCA-62$73,300$39,750
    Cheryl BrownDCA-47$12,800$3,500
    Joan BuchananDCA-16$139,350$23,700
    Ian C. CalderonDCA-57$51,600$17,476
    Nora CamposDCA-27$135,600$9,900
    Ed ChauDCA-49$126,390$23,896
    Rocky J. ChavezRCA-76$3,000$8,800
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$54,221$33,117
    Connie ConwayRCA-26$16,800$56,300
    Ken CooleyDCA-8$150,950$7,000
    Matthew DababnehDCA-45$0$0
    Brian DahleRCA-1$2,000$0
    Tom DalyDCA-69$43,200$16,300
    Roger DickinsonDCA-7$124,600$6,000
    Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$3,000
    Susan Talamantes EggmanDCA-13$57,150$14,300
    Paul FongDCA-28$107,850$7,300
    Steve FoxDCA-36$6,800$0
    Jim FrazierDCA-11$184,060$12,800
    Beth GainesRCA-6$3,500$22,450
    Cristina GarciaDCA-58$82,050$10,300
    Mike GattoDCA-43$139,300$25,326
    Jimmy GomezDCA-51$149,810$10,800
    Lorena S. GonzalezDCA-80$0$0
    Rich GordonDCA-24$97,200$11,400
    Jeff GorellRCA-44$5,000$12,300
    Adam C. GrayDCA-21$129,662$16,600
    Shannon GroveRCA-34$0$19,050
    Curt HagmanRCA-55$8,800$16,500
    Isadore HallDCA-64$71,300$28,900
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$8,800$28,650
    Roger HernandezDCA-48$118,150$23,800
    Chris R. HoldenDCA-41$139,100$20,725
    Brian JonesRCA-71$6,300$16,900
    Reginald B. Jones-Sawyer, Sr.DCA-59$105,250$7,500
    Marc LevineDCA-10$5,723$0
    Eric LinderRCA-60$2,000$1,100
    Dan LogueRCA-3$1,500$17,500
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$35,250$2,500
    Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$8,800$11,800
    Allan MansoorRCA-74$1,000$9,650
    Jose MedinaDCA-61$138,725$5,900
    Melissa A. MelendezRCA-67$2,000$10,050
    Kevin MullinDCA-22$150,100$4,556
    Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$148,100$15,400
    Adrin NazarianDCA-46$62,650$3,500
    Brian NestandeRCA-42$53,300$24,850
    Kristin OlsenRCA-12$6,300$19,300
    Richard PanDCA-9$141,671$20,450
    Jim PattersonRCA-23$0$0
    Henry PereaDCA-31$41,700$47,550
    John PerezDCA-53$252,650$82,300
    Manuel PerezDCA-56$67,150$26,750
    Bill QuirkDCA-20$108,850$500
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$67,899$17,350
    Anthony RendonDCA-63$126,100$17,850
    Sebastian Ridley-ThomasDCA-54$0$0
    Freddie RodriguezDCA-52$0$0
    Rudy SalasDCA-32$100,650$18,200
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$132,700$39,767
    Mark StoneDCA-29$50,450$2,500
    Philip Y. TingDCA-19$155,100$23,141
    Don WagnerRCA-68$7,800$2,500
    Marie WaldronRCA-75$4,900$8,400
    Shirley N. WeberDCA-79$51,900$2,000
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$87,680$15,500
    Scott WilkRCA-38$7,800$12,750
    Das WilliamsDCA-37$164,500$9,000
    Mariko YamadaDCA-4$42,200$4,500

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Construction unions$2,553,715
    State & local government employee unions$1,607,035
    Electrical workers/IBEW$639,400
    Gas & electric utilities$507,150
    Labor unions$108,760
    Chambers of commerce$101,135

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Gas & electric utilities$507,150
    Major (multinational) oil & gas producers$422,500
    Alternate energy production & services$183,826
    Waste management$182,125
    Minority & ethnic groups$107,941
    Water utilities$77,096
    Environmental policy$67,016
    Independent power generation & cogeneration$38,500
    Municipal & county government organizations$32,600
    Environmental services, equipment & consulting$17,900
    Public official (elected or appointed)$3,500
    Consumer groups$0
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range